To be or not to be, that is the question

This is not about Shakespeare’s Hamlet, although it’s a great play! This is a recap of some research by experts, doctors, and pharmaceutical sources on the function of the shots. The first Part A is an Executive Summary. Scroll further down for Part B, the research details. The Sources are at the very end.

A. Execuive Summary:  

  1. Ingredients Listed in the Shots:
    We know that many versions of the shots exist. The primary ingredients are: synthetic mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid), lipids, salts, and sugar. The shots are not a true waxx-een, because they do not contain any virus. (That’s  because the virus has never been isolated as required in a strict scientific laboratory.) Unlike traditional waxx-ines, these shots do not contain any virus or portion of the SARS-CoV-2 protein. The makers do not claim shots will protect against any virus, so we cannot assume the shots are related to the virus. This article focuses only on the shots. Since the shots are legally defined as a “Wax-een”, the makers are exempt from all responsibility, therefore we take it at our own risk. For these reasons, the shots fall into a brand new class of “experimental treatments never tried before on humans”.
  2. Undisclosed Ingredients include various proprietary elements in each brand. These are unknown. The shots also contain superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs)  to  deliver information to the genes via magneto-fection. They also contain Graphene oxide, a highly toxic liquid known to cause abortions in amimals and multi-generational health and growth defects. Graphene oxide is a liquid carrier used to stabilize emulsion of fats and fluid.
  3. Summary From Colleen Huber, NMD – A Naturopathic Doctor’s Perspective
    The biggest questions are: Do they protect you from Covid? NO, the shot does not protect you from Covid-19.
    Are they safe? NO Were there successful animal studies? NO, most of the animals died from various organ failures, and auto-immune dysfunction, but much later. There are excellent treatments available for coronavirus, therefore an experimental shot is not needed. Safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 have always been available. These include vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).  Find The Zelenko protocol—excellent combination of zinc, HCQ, and azithromycin—significantly reduces symptoms and deaths from COVID-19. There are more, but all have been heavily censored. See America’s Frontline Doctors website, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Carrie Madej.
  4. More Questions about the Shot
    How does it work? The idea behind mRNA shots is that to trick your body into creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will produce antibodies in response. But this is untested in humans, and the tests did not go well in animals. What happens when you turn your body into a viral protein factory, thus keeping antibody production activated on a continual basis with no ability to shut down? Repeatedly creating an antibody can cause a lot of harm in your body through auto-immune responses and there’s no off button.
    The biggest danger of the shot comes from existing data which shows that more shots actually causes more illness. Further there are unknown risks of auto-immune disease, because we are applying an experimental technique to hard-wire the immune system in a way that we have never done before.
  5. Adverse Reactions to the Shots not Accurately Measured
    Most common reactions to shots are allergic reactions, cardiac disorders, blood clotting, and nervous system disorders. Some reactions are immediate, some delayed. Some severe, some are mild. The 3 most common “allergens” are said to be in the lipid coatings:
    – 2[(PEG)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, in the Pfizer
    – PEG 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol, in the Moderna Shot
    – Polysorbate 80, in the Johnson & Johnson
  6. Efficacy of the PCR Test for CoVid-19,
    The PCR test is not designed to measure Cornoavirus. It is flawed and unreliable. The inventor of the test specifically says it should not be used.
  7. How to Protect Yourself and your Family:
    The Best Way to Refuse a Shot: Just say “No Thank you, I’ll Wait.”

    Conclusion: Studies show that diseases are enhanced and worsened by prior shots, contrary to public media. Vacksi-ninated people for a few months after, and perhaps a whole lifetime after, will experience greater suffering, disease, and risk of death as a result of the shot, although at the time their cause of death may appear to be something different. The deaths may appear to be due to Covid-19 or Covid 21, any future mutant virus, or a heart attack. But the deaths will most likely be primarily due to the shot.

Mike Yeadon, Former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer Says He Fears “Massive Depopulation” Through Mass ‘Vaxxi-nations’

Mike Yeadon Warns WAXXcines May be

Deliberate Depopulation Ploy

Mike Yeadon, ex-Chief Scientist of Pfizer, has stated that it may be too late to save those who have been injected with any Covid-19 wax-ines. He urges those who have not yet been injected with the deadly compound to reject it to save their lives and the lives of their children. The world acclaimed immunologist warns that many more people will probably yet be injured or killed by the waxxi-ination program. Many have died within 2 weeks of the shot. Many more are expected to be injured or killed by the long-term affects of the wax-ines with increasing danger with every top-up or “booster” injection.

Supplemental wax-ines are in development to cause degradation of specific organs – including heart, lungs and brain. Having been intimately acquainted with the functioning and goals of research and development of the Pharmaceutical giant, Pfizer for 2 decades, Professor Yeadon states that the final goal of the currently administered regime of wax-i-nations can only be a mass depopulation event.

And it’s not just this guy, thousands of extremely respected people in their fields are saying the same thing.

Indications are that PCR tests are sent out pre-counted so the number of positives and negatives in a particular area are predetermined.

History Tells Us Everything
In order to grasp the seriousness of the situation we are in, and to understand why, we need to look back in history to the times in which this very day had been forecast, obviously planned for, and now created.

Here is one clear example of our situation: 

Jacques Attali, an elite advisor to François Mitterrand (former President of France) said this to a friend back in 1981. This fragment is again repeated in his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in 2006.

“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.  

Then the weak and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society because there will be more and more, and especially finally the stupid.  

Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases.  

Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.  

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly rather than gradually deteriorate.  

We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!  

We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.  

The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.  

The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone.

Understand that we are smart enough to find our own solutions, and apply them. Those willing to make proactive protective measures, to maintain their health, and become more self-reliant will rise from this period of change and transformation successfully.
We will be the ones to structure the world to come with a new focus on the common good of all life everywhere. The old mindset expressed by that limited soul above will not be tolerated. That mindset, and those that harbor it, will vanish like the darkness before the approaching dawn.
It is true that many will go with the passing night, yet those that remain will then shine all the brighter.

B. More Detailed Analysis:

1. Ingredients in the Shots:

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot is made of the following ingredients:

  • mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the shot. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus.
  • We do not know yet if mRNA shots will alter our DNA. The RNA molecule can convert information stored in DNA into proteins. Shot makers insist that the mRNA shots never enter the nucleus of the cell, where our DNA is stored. After injection, they say the mRNA from the shot is released into the cytoplasm of the cells. Once the viral protein is made and on the surface of the cell, mRNA is broken down and the body permanently gets rid of it, in theory it should be impossible to change our DNA. Not all scientists agree, so we do not know.
  • Lipids – The following lipids are in the new COVID shot. Their main role is to protect the mRNA and provide somewhat of a “greasy” exterior that helps the mRNA slide inside the cells.
  • ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
  • (2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
  • 1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
  • cholesterol
  • Salts – The following salts are included in the Pfizer shot and help balance the acidity in your body.
  • potassium chloride
  • monobasic potassium phosphate
  • sodium chloride
  • dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
  • Sugar – Basic table sugar, also known as sucrose, can also be found in the new COVID shot. This ingredient helps the molecules maintain their shape during freezing.

(Note: Pfizer is holding back a little. The spike gene sequence can be tweaked in small ways for better performance, by means that include swapping letters. We don’t think Pfizer has said exactly what sequence it is using, or what modified nucleosides. That means the content of the shot may not be 100% public.)

Lipids: The Pfizer shot, like one from Moderna, uses lipid nanoparticles to encase the RNA. The nanoparticles are, basically, tiny greasy spheres that protect the mRNA and help it slide inside cells. These particles are probably around 100 nanometers across. Curiously, that’s about the same size as the coronavirus itself.

Pfizer says it uses four different lipids in a “defined ratio.” The lipid ALC-0315 is the primary ingredient in the formulation. That’s because it’s ionizable—it can be given a positive charge, and since the RNA has a negative one, they stick together. It’s also a component that can cause side-effects or allergic reactions. The other lipids, one of which is the familiar molecule cholesterol, are “helpers” that give structural integrity to the nanoparticles or stop them from clumping. During manufacturing, the RNA and the lipids are stirred into a bubbly mix to form what the FDA describes as a “white to off-white” frozen liquid.

Salts: The Pfizer shot contains four salts, one of which is ordinary table salt. Together, these salts are better known as phosphate-buffered saline, or PBS, a very common ingredient that keeps the pH, or acidity, of the shot close to that of a person’s body. You’ll understand how important that is if you’ve ever squeezed lemon juice on a cut. Substances with the wrong acidity can injure cells or get quickly degraded.

Sugar: The shot includes plain old sugar, also called sucrose. It’s acting here as a cryoprotectant to safeguard the nanoparticles when they’re frozen and stop them from sticking together.

Saline solution: Before injection, the shot is mixed with water containing sodium chloride, or ordinary salt, just as many intravenously delivered drugs are. Again, the idea is that the injection should more or less match the salt content of the blood.

No preservatives: Pfizer makes a point of saying its mixture of lipid nanoparticles and mRNA is “preservative-free.” That’s because a preservative that’s been used in other shots, thimerosal (which contains mercury and is there to kill any bacteria that might contaminate a vial), has been at the center of worries around over whether shots cause autism. The US Centers for Disease Control says thimerosal is safe; despite that, its use is being phased out. There is no thimerosal—or any other preservative—in the Pfizer shot. No microchips, either.

The Pfizer shot is still known by the code name BNT162b. But once it’s authorized, Pfizer will give it a new, commercial name that conveys something about what’s in it and what it promises for the world.

The Moderna COVID-19 Shot is made of the following ingredients:

  • mRNA – Like the Pfizer BioNTech shot, Moderna’s also uses mRNA technology to build antibodies against COVID-19.
  • Lipids – The Moderna shot also requires lipids to help deliver the mRNA to the cells.
  • SM-102
  • 1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero3-methoxypolyethylene glycol-2000 [PEG2000-DMG]
  • cholesterol
  • 1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]
  • The remaining ingredients (below), including acids, acid stabilizers, salt and sugar all work together to maintain the stability of the shot after it’s produced.
  • Acids
  • Acetic acid
  • Acid Stabilizers
  • Tromethamine & Tromethamine hydrochloride
  • Salts
  • Sodium acetate
  • Sugar
  • Sucrose

The Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 Shot is made of the following ingredients:

  • Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This is a modified and theoretically harmless version of a different virus (Adenovirus 26) is used as a “vector” to deliver the DNA gene sequence to produce the coronavirus spike protein. Once the modified adenovirus shot enters into the cells, in theory the body of the virus essentially disintegrates and the DNA material within it travels into the nucleus of the human cell where it is transcribed into mRNA. The coronavirus spike protein is then produced and displayed on the cell’s surface, prompting the immune system to begin producing antibodies and activating T-cells to fight off what it “thinks” is an infection.
  • The Adenovirus 26 in the J&J shot does not replicate, and like the mRNA shot, theoretically does not change our genetic code. But not all scientists agree on this.
  • Acids
  • citric acid monohydrate
  • Salts
  • trisodium citrate dihydrate
  • Sugars
  • 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD)
  • polysorbate-80, sodium chloride
  • Other ingredients: ethanol
  • That’s it!


2. From Colleen Huber, NMD, a Doctor’s Perspective

This section is from, by Colleen Huber, NMD, February 21, 2021, last updated April 10, 2021

Most of the links below are from medical journals, the FDA, CDC, and other entities that generally support waxxi-ination, yet the information in this article shows how EXTREMELY RISKY the COVID-19 waxx-ines are.

In my family, we have a rule:  If you consider having an experimental medical procedure done,

  1. Don’t even think of insisting that anyone else have it done, inside or outside the family, because they control their own bodies and health decisions, not you; and

  2. Be sure you have read about and can explain in your own words all of the known risks of that procedure before embarking on it.  Also, consider potential future risks.

I ask that you, the reader, at least take time to consider the above, and at least consider reading information in the links below, before submitting to this experimental medical procedure.

Is the COVID waxx-ine experimental?  
Yes. Pfizer and Moderna make the COVID-19 waxx-ines in the US. The FDA granted “
emergency use authorization” for these waxx-ines (herein “COVID injections,” because they are unlike conventional waxx-ines). Emergency use authorization is required by law to be made only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19.  

  • But are there effective COVID-19 treatments?  100s of studies done around the world have established, and repeatedly confirmed, fast, effective, well-tolerated treatments for COVID-19 that are in widespread use.  I briefly summarize them here

  • General risk vs benefit: An emergency experimental waxx-ine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate, such as COVID-19.  The average survival rate for     NO COVID treatment at all is 99.74%, and we have very successful treatments available, which should easily achieve universal survivability from COVID, if widely available.  Where does 99.74% survival come from?  Dr. John Ioannidis is the most widely cited scientist in the world.  His estimate in June 2020 of a 0.26% infection fatality rate is now confirmed around the world.    100% – 0.26% = 99.74% average survival rate.

Does the COVID injection work? 
No. The COVID injection is not even known to stop the spread of COVID.  Dr. Larry Corey, who oversees National Institutes of Health COVID-19 waxx-eene rials said on 11/20/20: “The studies aren’t designed to assess transmission.  They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time.”

The FDA confirms that the 1st waxx-eene dose correlates with increased COVID-19 infections.  “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any waxx-een-ation were 409 in the waxx-eene group vs 287 in the placebo group.”  This data comes from Pfizer itself.  See p 42 of

What happened to the animals in the studies? 
This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done,
all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure.  There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology.  No experimental coronavirus waxx-eene has succeeded in animal studies.  In this study, coronavirus waxx-eene caused liver inflammation in test animals.

Specific risks of COVID injections, in roughly chronological order of side-effect manifestation:

  • The mRNA is not a traditional waxx-eene, of injected, inactivated virus intended to stimulate antibody response. The COVID injection on the other hand is completely different in this respect.  It uses messenger RNA (mRNA), which is a blueprint for your cells to create COVID-like (spike) proteins.  Then your cells begin to make these COVID-like proteins.  However, those proteins, in turn, stimulate your body to make antibodies against them.  So now your body has been turned into a munitions factory for both sides of a war:  The bad guys (COVID-like spike proteins) and the good guys (the antibodies fighting against them).  However, before you pledge allegiance to the good guys, as you will see below, the good guys can be more lethal to the waxx-ee-nated person.

  • History of mRNA injections: This technology had disastrous results in dengue fever waxx-eenes in the past.  Dengue waxx-eene is a mRNA waxx-eeneWhen this was used in children in the Philippines, many waxx-een-ated children had far worse outcomes than un-wassin-nated children when they were later exposed to dengue, and many died.  Prosecution for homicide resulted.  However, this had previously been known to happen with ferrets and with cats. In all cases, the waxxi-nated animal or human became more vulnerable to worse disease when confronted with it. It is expected that the relatively mild COVID-19 illness, with a survival rate of 99.74%, may reduce to a much lower survival rate and become a truly lethal disease in waxxi-nated people when they later become infected with it.  There are no peer-reviewed published human trials of mRNA waxx-eenes at all, and no mRNA waxx-eene has ever been FDA “approved”. That’s how new the technology is.

  • mRNA can affect DNA.  One of the most worrisome risks with a mRNA waxx-eene is what can happen with reverse transcriptase.  This is an enzyme in every cell, and it can theoretically lead to the mRNA creating changes in the cells’ DNA, a process known as viral retro-integration.   Although this possibility had been thought unlikely, MIT and Harvard scientists found it happened here.  If some of the 30 trillion or so cells in your body become permanent COVID factories, what is the long-term impact on your health, and would you want that outcome?

  • Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) problem:   Prior attempts to create a coronavirus waxx-eene killed all the test animals, after they were later infected with wild virus. Here’s how that t happened: mRNA instructed the mammals’ cells to produce the spike proteins of the coronavirus.  Then, later, when the animals confronted the wild virus, the intense build-up of antibodies had been stockpiled, and their sudden and overwhelming release killed the test animal.  These risks have been documented in Nature, Science and Journal of Infectious Diseases.  Here’s a study from Nature on that.

  • ADE mechanism:  ADE is a form of pathogenic priming, meaning the waxx-eene can result in a more severe disease, which has been seen in prior attempts at making coronavirus waxx-eenes.  The antibodies made can be neutralizing (which inactivate a virus, and that’s good), but antibodies are a problem when they are non-neutralizing, because then these antibodies carry active viruses directly to macrophages, which then become infected.  This is how ADE happens.

This antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) leads to:

  • What about miscarriages, and why have men been advised to freeze their sperm prior to getting the injection?  Both men and women are at risk for possibly permanent infertility, because the spike protein of a coronavirus “looks” to the immune system similar to Syncytin-1, an essential protein in the placenta.  This stimulates antibodies to fight the placenta, and possibly sperm.  Mid-term miscarriages, which are normally very rare, have occurred in women who have been waxx-een-nated for COVID.  SARS-CoV-2 viral particles have been found to linger in the testicles of men after recovery from infection.

  • Why are COVID waxx-eenes MORE likely to spread COVID than the un-waxx-een-ated?  Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, who worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recently warned the World Health Organization (WHO) that “We are currently turning waxx-eenes into carriers shedding infectious variants.”  The Red Cross says, “At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 waxx-eene are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross.”

  • Why is it more dangerous to waxx-eenate against COVID-19 than other viruses?  Because COVID-19 virus uses the ACE-2 receptor to get into your endothelial cells, including those lining the blood vessels.  This creates an inflammatory reaction that the great majority (99.74%) have survived even without treatment, and even more who used known, effective treatments. (See page 1)  So if you have been exposed to the virus, and then get waxx-een-nated, it is almost certain that the waxx-eene will cause new inflammation and damage to endothelial cells lining your blood vessels, and we have seen short-term abnormal blood clotting in people who have gotten the waxx-eene.  But the more likely problem is launching new disease in the blood vessels.  Dr. H Noorchashm MD, PhD says, “. . . the waxx-eene is almost certain to do damage to the vascular endothelium.” He explains here

Israel is at this writing the most heavily COVID-waxx-ee-nated country in the world.  The findings of infectious disease experts are reported here, in which they determined, from the Israeli data, that the COVID injection causes:  ” . . .mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the waxx-eene, and dozens of times more in the elderly . . .”

3. More Questions about the Shots:

Is the Covid-19 shot actually a vacksseene?
No. It is not a vacksseene. However, if they call it a vacksseene they can skip safety studies.
If they call it a vacksseene, the drug companies are exempt from all legal liability.
The definition of vacksseene is a “suspension of attenuated or killed microorganisms administered for prevention, amelioration, or treatment of infectious diseases”. But the COVID 19 vacksseene contains nothing in it at all related to the actual virus. So, it doesn’t meet the definition of vacksseene. (In fact, the virus Covid-19 has never actually been isolated. And that is why the tests are utterly unreliable.)

How Does the synthetic mRNA shot work to prevent Covid-19?
The idea behind mRNA shots is that to trick your body into creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will produce antibodies in response. But this is untested inn humans, and the tests did not go well in animals. What happens when you turn your body into a viral protein factory, thus keeping antibody production activated on a continual basis with no ability to shut down? Repeatedly creating an antibody can cause a lot of harm in your body through auto-immune responses and there’s no off button.

Is There A Good Test to Measure Risk of a Negative Outcome?
Yes. The Indonesians did a study, and they crunched all that data. They discovered that people with a vitamin D level of 30 or greater have less than a 4% chance of having any negative outcome if they can track this infection. That’s really important. So, the best test for susceptibility is your Vitamin D level. It should be 30 or more. Everyone really should know their vitamin D level.

Will the mRNA penetrate into my DNA?
We are not sure. It’s a permanent alteration to your immune system. And when you read the science, those particles, those particulate matter of that RNA can incorporate into your cellular genetics.

How long will the Synthetic mRNA remain in your body before it is broken down?
We don’t know how long will the synthetic RNA in COVID-19 shots be maintained within your body, causing your cells to produce this aberrant protein? Dr. Mikovits believes it may escape degradation for months, years, maybe even for life in some cases.

Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make. By comparison, mRNA shots send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.

According to the CDC and most mRNA shot scientists, they insist that  mRNA shots “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”

But, a study of SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and MIT produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates. Scientists were “puzzled by the fact that a number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.” They found: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.

According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA shots on shakier ground. Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA shots — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vax RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.

In Corrigan’s view, “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus. Reverse transcription is common. Geneticists say, “Over 40% of mammalian genomes are the products of reverse transcription.”

What are Some Challenges the Shot Makers Need to Overcome?
We need to learn how to make shots more stable at all temperatures.

We know mRNA and its lipid coat is relatively unstable in a fridge or at room temperature. That’s because RNA is more sensitive than DNA to enzymes in the environment that will degrade it. To overcome this, researchers are testing different types of additives to extend the shots’ shelf life. Some of these additives have been used in shots before for example, small amounts of common sugars.

They are working to reduce the amount in each shot.
The current mRNA shot doses range from 30 micrograms (Pfizer/BioNTech) to 100 micrograms (Moderna). Self-amplifying mRNA is another approach to reduce shot doses. Self-amplifying mRNA is engineered to make more copies of itself once delivered into cells. Like time-release vitamins. This means only a small initial dose is needed.

They Are Working on A Way to Switch from Two Doses to One.
Current mRNA COVID-19 shots need “boosting”. The first injection primes the immune system, then a second one, three to four weeks later, boosts the immune response. It would be administratively much simpler if a single shot could do the job. And if COVID-19 remains with us, in the future we will need to boost the immune response regularly, such as with yearly flu shots. In this case, a once-a-year booster shot will be a single injection, rather than the current strategy.

How can we stay head of virus variants and have boosters ready?
Fortunately making modified mRNA shots for mutants is quick and simple. The main hurdle for a varied sequence will be regulatory approval. However, in a recent interview, the US Food and Drug Administration suggested mRNA shots against mutated versions may be accepted with a small clinical trial (or no trials for future mutations).

What are the Long-Term Effects of Messenger RNA Shots?
We do not know. We have never, ever, ever used Messenger RNA in any vackseene … ever!
We do not know what the long-term consequences are.

What is the greatest danger in the mRNA shotss?
It’s the re-exposure that leads to the anti-body dependent enhancement and all this accelerated auto-immune disease. There are 36 different Corona Viruses in the environment, seven of them known to infect humans and they’ve been around for over 60 years. They were out there long before Covid ever showed up, so we’re going to get these anti-bodies, these non-binding anti-bodies, and Corona Virus is going to start showing up, and it’s going to start killing people.

We are not going to see this straight away. Some people are going to get the shot and because of some of these other ingredients they may go into anaphylactic shock and people are going to die from that. They will die from cardiovascular disease and ITP, an autoimmune blood disorder which is when probably the spike anti-body starts attacking the red blood cells, breaking it down, and you can die from that.

What is the most likely timeline for adverse events from the shots?
Most allergic reactions are evident within 15 to 30 minutes of receiving the shot. However the greater danger lies in encountering other immune challenges in the following days, weeks, months, and years. Some people will die immediately, but others much later. So, some people may die from the shot directly. The greatest danger is that a large number of people are going to start getting horribly sick with all kinds of auto-immune diseases, 42 days to maybe a year later. What are these stupid doctors going to do, who said “Take the shot”? They’ll say: “Oh, it must be a mutant, we need to give an extra dose of that shot”

Have there been animal studies of mRNA shots? How did they turn out?
Experiments in animals showed up a real problem. Many of the experimental animals actually died of lung infection and inflammation. When they examined them, they found their lungs were filled up with inflamed tissues, Type 1, pro-inflammatory, highly cytokine types of macrophages and zero Type 2 macrophages.

However, when they examined the animals that had NOT been vackscinnated but had been sick, they found that within two days of getting sick without the shot, the animal began to heal. The Type 2 macrophages had come into the infection and started cleaning up the mess and started healing it as long as they didn’t have the presence of a mRNA spike anti-body.

In one test, the vackscinated animals all died. Because the presence of the spike anti-body blocked their normal immune function. The mRNA killed them; it didn’t allow them to do their job.

In another series of animal studies with Dr. Lee Merritt, after mRNA injections were given to cats, when the virus arrived again into the body, it was totally undetected by the cats’ own immune system. Like a Trojan horse, the virus multiplied unchallenged. All animals in the experiment died upon reinfection, although the actual cause of death was varied.

Watch Video here:

According to Dr. Lee Merritt: What happened is all animals died. But they didn’t die of the “shot”. They died from what used to be called “immune enhancement” and now they call it “antibody dependent enhancement” (ADE).

What is the Mechanism in the Animal’s Body by Which it Began to Attack Itself?
They make the mRNA, and the animal gets the “shot” and they do fine. Now, you challenge the animal with the virus that you are supposed to be immunizing against.

When they challenged those cats with SARS Coronavirus, instead of killing the virus or weakening it, the cat’s immune response that they built into your system coded the virus, so the virus came into the cat’s body like a Trojan Horse, unseen by the cat’s own immune system. Then it replicated without checking and killed the cat with overwhelming sepsis and cardiac failure. That also happened in ferrets, every time they tried this.

The synthetic mRNA goes into your genes and starts stimulating an immune response. You can’t get rid of it because the genetic change is permanent. You become a genetically modified organism, and your body is expressing the virus protein. Slowly your immune system tries to get rid of it, but it is integrated into who you are. We are making the virus protein ourselves.

So, when you come in contact with a natural virus, normally your immune system would know how to get rid of it. But suddenly the antibody response would react and start attaching your cells and our organs. Like an auto-immune disease when the body attacks itself. The result is toxic shock, sepsis, and organ failure within 10 days. We can distinguish this in an autopsy if it is inflammation from a virus in the lungs. A skilled pathologist can say if it is a result of organ failure after the shot. The immune system starts to attack the organs.

Let me just point out. We have never made it through an animal study successfully for this type of virus. We have never done this in humans before. We have no track record of success.

If I’m not sure about the Shot. What should I do?
You need to do your own digging and research. If you’re undecided right now for this particularshot, then wait. Back in March 2020, they did lots of surveys. One of the surveys showed about 70% of people wanted the shot as soon as it was ready. Now eight, nine months later, the current surveys are saying it’s up to 65% are saying NO, they do not want it. So, I will not take it. And if you are undecided, just wait.

What is Your Conclusion?
Disease is enhanced and worsened by prior shots. Vacksininated people for a few months after, and perhaps a whole lifetime after, will experience greater suffering, disease, and risk of death as a result of the shot, even though at the time their cause of death may seem to be different. The deaths may appear to be due to Covid-19 or Covid 21, or any future mutant virus. But the deaths will in fact be due to the shot. However, on the other hand, human beings are a resilient bunch. Maybe some of them will overcome the adverse “scientific” facts, to live long and happy lives.

Never has there been a shot like this.
The new RNA shot will fundamentally change people’s DNA. We have no experience with this.

4. Adverse Reactions

UK Shot Reactions and Deaths Through 10 April, 2021

UK Reported Reported
Shot Deaths Injuries
Pfizer 3,760 134,606
Moderna 1,801 13,426
Johnson 15 170
AstraZeneca 1,086 150,863
Total 6,662 299,065

Partial Breakdown of Injuries for the experimental mRNA shot Tozinameran (code BNT162b2, Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer through April 10, 2021.

3,760 deaths and 134,606 injuries to 10/04/2021

  • 10,021   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 31 deaths
  • 6,413     Cardiac disorders incl. 442 deaths
  • 44           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 3,620      Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 93           Endocrine disorders
  • 3,997     Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
  • 30,091   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 196 deaths
  • 93,635   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,279 deaths
  • 171        Hepatobiliary disorders  incl.  14 deaths
  • 2,808     Immune system disorders incl. 15 deaths
  • 8,451     Infections and infestations incl.  380 deaths
  • 3,210     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications   incl. 66 deaths
  • 6,560     Investigations incl. 147 deaths
  • 2,207     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 79 deaths
  • 48,571   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 40 deaths
  • 109        Neoplasms (cysts and polyps) incl. 7 deaths
  • 59,021   Nervous system disorders incl. 335 deaths
  • 152        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 6 deaths
  • 70           Product issues
  • 5,208     Psychiatric disorders incl. 52 deaths
  • 807        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 57 deaths
  • 806        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
  • 12,075   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders   incl. 432 deaths
  • 14,257   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders   incl. 31 deaths
  • 352        Social circumstances incl. 5 deaths
  • 101        Surgical and medical procedures incl 5 deaths
  • 6,996     Vascular disorders incl. 131 deaths



5. Efficacy of the PCR Test for CoVid-19

7 Questions That Will Save Your Life

PCR Test Invented by Kary Mullis:
Kary Banks Mullis was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith, was awarded the Japan Prize the same year. Born: Kary Banks Mullis, December 28, 1944, Lenoir, North Carolina, U.S.
Died: August 07, 2019, Newport Beach, California, U.S.

Here are the basic facts on the official CDC test. The PCR was never invented and cannot be used, to identify an active virus, yet it is the justification to shut down the world’s economy and transfer wealth to the central banks. Shot production is financed through massive economic bailouts, tied to Central Bank debt issuance. Public knowledge is required to continue developing an ongoing case of potential fraud by government officials and business interests, surrounding its unintended use.

“You cannot use PCR to prove infectious ideology or to diagnose an infectious disease”
PCR inventor Kary Mullis

What can you use the PCR test for? What is Gold Standard vs. Surrogate Testing?
The test being used is a surrogate test.

What is the difference between a surrogate test and a gold standard test? In a situation where you are trying to prove causation, you must have a gold standard test. The test for meningococcus bacteria, for instance, is a gold standard test. It is reliable 100% of the time. You cannot use a surrogate test to prove anything. The gold standard test means proof of Isolation, Purification, Reinfection. A Gold Standard test has isolation of the organism, purification, reinfection, and viremia (the presence of viruses in the blood.) We don’t have this. We cannot see millions of copies of the virus on an electron microscope with the current surrogate test. We essentially have no idea who has the coronavirus disease.

So, what do they have to test in the PCR Process? They have a unique protein, RNA sequence which has never been discovered before, which they say is unique to this virus. They take this and amplify it from a blood sample. In your blood you will have one of these RNA sequences, but it is too small to find and so they amplify the sample to find the sequence.

The PCR stimulates the sample and that makes one copy. The second time it produces 4 copies and so on. Once you complete 36 cycles, you begin to see the color change that tells you it’s positive. So, if you do 35 cycles it is still too small to see. At 36 you start to see it, but you get false negatives. However, you cannot be sure which are false negatives because you have nothing to compare it to. So, you go up to 37 cycles and you see it 5% of the time in people with these symptoms, and you say that is the number of cycles to run the test.

“The PCR makes a lot of something, out of something.” – Inventor Kary Mullis

Interestingly, when you run 40 cycles you begin to see a lot more positives. If you do it 60 times you will always get a positive. You Will Always Get A Positive Result at 60 Cycles in 100% of the People tested! In other words, we all have a trace of this sequence in us. In fact, there will be a trace of it in any suitable biological sample. This is why it has been found in samples of fruit and other unrelated non-human sources.

The PCR test is based on the principle that there are biological traces of anything biological in everything else which is biological. You will find a biological trace of one identifier in any biological sample, in varying amounts. The PCR can find the relative amount in the sample if you have an identifier.

All Biological Tests Have False Positives
That is why a gold standard test requires isolation of the virus. Or a picture, under an electron microscope. You can compare the results and determine if it is a false positive. CoVid has not been isolated, but a unique sequence has been found associated with the virus, which is a SARS-CoV-2 virus. So, if you test 30,000,000 people and get a 1% false positive rate, that’s 300,000 people reported infected. That is the definition of an “epidemic”.

Amplification is everything.
If you raise it to 40 cycles, you can declare emergency measures based on the test results. Many more will test positive, guaranteed. So, if you turn your PCR amplification rate down to below 40, closer to 37-35 cycles, positive tests will drop off and administrators can say the measures, or the shot or whatever we have done is “working”. Every country has their own standard for testing. We have not found the rate for the U.S. yet and different states may have their own separate testing cycle rate also.


  1. What is your nation’s or state’s PCR amplification rate?
  2. Is the rate constant or does it vary?
  3. By what standard is it set?
  4. How do you know if published positive test results also contain false positives?
  5. Since all tests, including gold standard tests, include false positives, by what percentage % are false positives calculated?
  6. How is this estimated without a gold standard test?
  7. What % of positive tests actually become medical cases under a doctor’s care, hospitalizations, and fatalities?

Atomic Bombshell: We Have Proof That Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests In 2015. Click to see link. This is not disputable, as the information comes from official patent registries in the Netherlands and US. We have all the documentation.

6. How to protect yourself and your family

  • Always read the Product Package Insert.  This is required by law to be included with packaging of all waxx-eenes, and US Informed Consent law protects your right to be fully informed prior to any medical procedure, and your right to reject any medical procedure.  45 CFR § 46.116 These are universal principles enshrined in the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Here is the Pfizer insert, and here is Moderna’s.  I strongly recommend reading ALL of it carefully with your family before you make a decision regarding whether to have the COVID injection.

  • Discuss the considerations above, as well as other information you have heard about the COVID injection in a relaxed, unhurried setting with your loved ones.  Make sure that you are not pressured into a procedure that you may regret in the future.  If you choose to defer or reject the COVID injection, know that you are not alone, and many healthcare workers have done the same.  “I’ve heard Tuskegee more times than I can count in the last month – and, you know, it’s a valid, valid concern.” Dr. Nikhila Juvvadi, a hospital chief clinical officer.

  • Share this page with others who are also considering the waxx-eene. 

  • If your employer or school attempts mandatory waxx-eene-nation, show this information to them.  Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring waxx-eene-nation, such as the COVID injection, that is under EUA (explained above). You should also consult your attorney to look into state and federal law prohibiting forced medical procedures. and may also have helpful information.

  • If you have read and understood this article, and the warnings in all the scientific studies linked, you can now see that  taking the COVID injection is an act of extreme and reckless self-destruction.  As a physician, I strongly advise against this waxx-eene, regardless of brand, for everyone, without exception.

  • If on the other hand, you find that the scientific information in this paper is overwhelming,there is another way to look at COVID virus vs COVID waxx-eene risks. How many famous people died within 2 weeks after taking the COVID waxx-eene?

The Best Way to Refuse a Shot:  Just Say “No Thank you, I’ll Wait.”

Human Rights and the Nuremburg Code
Big Pharma companies hold no liability for vackseeen injury or death. These are experimental shots and therefore must fall under the umbrella of human rights violations if they are forced upon people.

It also violates the Nuremburg Code of informed consent. The Nuremburg Code was a result of the Nuremburg Military Tribunal held in August of 1947 established to try several high-ranking Nazis as war criminals. Among the defendants were physicians who had either ordered or performed the torture or murder of prisoners in numerous Nazi concentration and death camps.

Since ancient times, beneficence (goodness) has been a key principle of the medical profession, enshrined in the Hippocratic Oath and subsequent codes of medical ethics. Beneficence means physicians must always put the needs and welfare of patients first. However, until the verdict was handed down in the Nuremberg “Doctors Trial” of 1946, the specific rights of human subjects of modern biomedical research were not codified.

The threat of forcing or compelling people to become unwilling guinea pigs in an ongoing medical experiment is immoral on its face. But even the prospect of enforcing such mandates would entail the erection of a surveillance and tracking system that further threatens basic rights and liberties. After all, in order to determine who has been vackcksininated…there will need to be a system for identifying and tracking each shot recipient.

Healing Resources: Best Treatments for COVID-19.
Safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 have always been available. These include vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). There are others, but all have been heavily censored. See America’s Frontline Doctors website, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Carrie Madej.

Find The Zelenko protocol—a combination of zinc, HCQ, and azithromycin—significantly reduces symptoms, hospitalization, and deaths from COVID-19.

Allergens in the Shots

A serious allergic reaction to the shot is called anaphylaxis. Most (86%) anaphylaxis cases had symptom onset within 30 minutes of receiving a shot. Most persons with anaphylaxis (81%) had a history of allergies or allergic reactions, including some with previous anaphylaxis events. Up to 30% of persons in the general population might have some type of allergy or history of allergic reactions. Most of the people who (90%) reported anaphylaxis cases after receipt of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot occurred in women.

The FDA, CDC makes these recommendations, but they could change at any time.

Anyone receiving the waxx-eene should be pre-screened to determine possible risk of an allergic reaction to the mRNA (Moderna and Pfizer) and adenovirus vector (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 waxx-eenes. You should be asked if you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to any prior waxx-eene. If the answer is yes, you should be referred to a board-certified allergist/immunologist for further evaluation prior to COVID-19 waxx-ee-nation.

The mRNA and adenovirus vector COVID-19 waxx-eenes should not be administered to individuals with a known history of a severe allergic reaction to any component of a particular waxx-eene. Although the specific waxx-eene component causing the anaphylaxis has not been identified, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the ingredients in the mRNA waxx-eenes and has been known to cause anaphylaxis.  Also, Polysorbate 80 is an ingredient in the Johnson & Johnson waxx-eene which may cause anaphylaxis and may cross-react with PEG.

Patients with allergic reactions to PEG should not be immunized with the mRNA COVID-19 waxx-eenes. However, at another time perthe CDC, a polysorbate allergy is no longer a contraindication to mRNA COVID-19 waxx-ee-nation, it is rather a precaution. However, because of potential cross-reactive hypersensitivity between ingredients in mRNA and adenovirus vector COVID-19 waxx-eenes, consultation with an allergist-immunologist should be considered to help determine if the patient can safely receive wax-ee-nation. If the mRNA waxx-eene is given in a patient with polysorbate allergy, it should be done in a setting able to treat anaphylaxis and the patient observed a minimum of 30 minutes after the injection.

Data regarding risk in individuals with a history of allergic reactions related to mast cell activation syndrome/idiopathic anaphylaxis is very limited and evolving. A decision to receive COVID-19 waxx-eenes should be undertaken by you with your physician or other provider administering the waxx-eene using their professional judgment balancing the benefits and risks associated with taking the waxx-eene.

People with common allergies to medications, foods, inhalants, insects, and latex are probably no more likely than the general public to have an allergic reaction to the mRNA COVID-19 waxx-eenes. Those patients should be informed of the benefits of the waxx-eene versus its risks.

Specifically, any allergy to PEG will be regarded with caution, although at the CDC it is not considered a contraindication the waxx-eene. These lipid chemicals include:

  • 2[(PEG)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, in the Pfizer
  • PEG 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol, in the Moderna Shot
  • Polysorbate 80, in the Johnson & Johnson waxx-eene

Importantly, history of severe allergy does not preclude waxx-ee-nation unless that allergy is to the waxx-eene or its specific components. Only one of the excipients in the Pfizer-BioNTech waxx-eene is a known potential allergen, polyethylene glycol (PEG 2000), and this is an inactive ingredient in over 1000 medications. The Oxford-AstraZeneca waxx-eene does not contain PEG 2000 so remains an alternative for people with a history of allergy to this ingredient. However, there is some cross-reactivity between PEG and polysorbate 80, an ingredient in the Oxford-AstraZeneca waxx-eene, so evaluation by an allergy specialist may be advisable before waxx-ee-nation in anyone with a suspected PEG allergy history. Allergies are specific to a particular substance, however people with one drug allergy may be more susceptible to other drug allergies than the general population.

Finally, the best approaches to waxx-eene hesitancy include “science, education, access, civil discourse, and debate,” not coercion or censorship. Waxx-ee-nators should be prepared to provide information, explain the difference between severe, moderate, and mild allergies, and clarify MHRA’s decision making. People’s views about covid waxx-eene may transfer to other waxx-eenes— such as regular immunization for themselves and their families—and future waxx-eenes, so maintain open lines of communication. If waxx-ee-nation is declined, these people should be reassured that they can return.

Some allergist can perform skin-testing to determine if a patient is allergic to a substance in the waxx-eene. Therefore, it may still be possible to waxx-ee-nate people with allergies to specific ingredients. Allergists can assess patients who report allergy to a waxx-eene, injectable medication, or PEG and give them the skin test and then go ahead with waxx-ee-nation with the routine 15 – 30 minutes of observation.

Instructions for administrators:
These four screening questions are presented to patients before the initial waxx-ee-nation to assess risk:

  1. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to an injectable medication (intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous)?
  2. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous vacksceene?
  3. Do you have a history of a severe allergic reaction to another allergen (eg, food, venom, or latex)?
  4. Do you have a history of an immediate or severe allergic re- action to PEG-, a polysorbate-, or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (eg, paclitaxel)-containing injectable or vacksceene?


History of the following:  Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after a previous dose or to a component of the waxx-eene. Immediate allergic reaction of any severity after a previous dose or known (diagnosed) allergy to a component of the waxx-eene.

Administrator Instructions::

  • Do not waxx-eenate.
  • Consider referral to allergist-immunologist.
  • Consider other waxx-eene alternative.

What are your Best Options?

Conclusion: Refuse This Waxx-eene if at All Possible, It Doesn’t Work.
It is suggested that a simple refusal should be sufficient to say “No Thank you, I’ll Wait” to any waxx-eene. Other options are to leave the premises. Another option is to have a pre-existing allergy to one of the PEG ingredients. Or a doctor’s letter saying you need to avoid the waxx-eene for some reason.

Suggested Links:

  1. Could mRNA waxx-eenes Permanently Alter DNA? Recent Science Suggests They Might.
  9. The COVID WAXXIN-ation: Unapproved, Experimental, and Potentially Fatal-Part II,
  10. Dr. Christiane Northrup,
  11. Waxx-ine Rights,
  12. How to Reclaim Your Medical Freedom,
  13. ACAAI Updates to Guidance on Risk of Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 waxx-eenes,
  14. Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Shot — United States, December 14–23, 2020,
  15. mRNA Shots to Prevent COVID-19 Disease and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current Evidence and Suggested Approach,
  16. Shots against covid-19 in people who report allergies,
  17. Reiner Fuellmich: ‘We Have The Evidence’
  22. Effects of graphene oxide on the development of offspring mice in lactation period




Comments are closed.